FOUNDATIONS FOR RESEARCH Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

FOUNDATIONS FOR RESEARCH - Essay ExampleTo amend this gap in fellowship about mood disorders in adolescents, it has been claimed that theoretical perspectives should get out from adolescents understanding and experiences (Griez 2005 47). If not, the theorising process will continue to be removed from the perspectives of individuals who have really go through mood disorders (Wolfe & Mash 2008 83). The objective of the aforementioned study was to take back a theoretical perspective that essentially represented the perceptions of adolescents who had go through mood disorders. Lewis (1995372) investigated, employing qualitative systems, how participants personally experienced mood disorders, how they reached and perceived the label of mood disorder, and how they understood their experiences. In addition, Karp (1996 91), in Speaking of Sadness, explained the identity-changing process that participants experienced as they eventually viewed themselves as depressed and carried on theor ising about their own selves and how they acquired their mood disorders. In this paper, a thorough discussion on the different features of the grounded system method will be provided by presenting an headmaster research article, Meaduss (2007) study, which contains the grounded theory method. The Application of Grounded Theory in Mood Disorder Research The grounded theory method, fit in to Straus & Corbin (1990), the goal of which is to form a theory that is closely related to the reality of the adolescents studied was apply in the study of Meadus (2007). Through the grounded theory method, theory arises from evaluating the actual statements given by the participants, and is hence genuinely grounded in them (Strauss & Corbin 1990 17). However, the problem in using an inductive research method for mood disorder research, according to Griez (2005 72), is that it inevitably results in analyses that go beyond the statements given by the participants. Stiles (1993) suggests that par ticipants give relevant information to the researcher, plainly that the researcher should analyse that data to form a reflective theory. Meanwhile, reflexivity obliges the researcher to thoroughly mean about the research process, which involves probing how strongly the interpretations of the researcher fit with the perspectives of the participants (Rennie, Phillips, & Quartaro 1988 143). The grounded theory method was employed in the study of Meadus (2007) because it allowed a methodical analysis that enabled the creation of a theoretical perspective that was strongly machine-accessible to, otherwise ideally representative of, the explanations of the participants. According to Merriam (2009 30), data analysis in grounded theory is performed using the constant-comparative method in which bits and pieces of data are compared in terms of their similarities and differences. Merriam (2009 31-32) furthers that part of the data analysis is the identification of a core category. The core category is the central concept where all data revolves around and this is used to develop the substantive theory. Emphasis is given on the importance of identifying categories, hypotheses, and theories from the patterns seen among the relationships formed from the data gathered. To better understand the features of a grounded theory, the research of