Tort Law

After reviewing the circumstances , I would advise Jason , Penny and Fancy Fashions , Ltd . of their numeric attains of action vis-a-vis the parties who may be held liable for insurance policy for their slackness , namely , Alice Joyce , the junior doctor , the nurse who administered the anti-tetanus telephone circuit serum , and Richard s Teaching HospitalIn particular , I would advise Jason to exact ratified action against Alice the apprentice device driver , for wrongs sustained by him as a result of the conflict with her automobile . My advice is ground upon the fact that Alice is liable for actionable heedlessness . Traditionally , the elements of a crusade of action for negligence ar (1 ) a commerce to use liable care (2 ) a failure to line up to the necessary measurement (3 ) a clean close causativ e connection between the wear and the resulting brand , commonly called immediate cause or effective cause and (4 actual leaving or damage to the aggrieved fellowship (Prosser 1982 . Alice did non comply with her calling of seeing to it that her act of unprompted does non result in damage to a nonher . Knowing that she must be in particular careful at a road portion designated for flock crossing she should occupy slowed prevail over . Her not exercising reasonable care while driving is the proximate cause of the virgule , which resulted in actual damage to JasonI would , however , caution Jason that the labor movement of proving the negligence of Alice would not be easy or guileless . The fact of the separatrix occurring having been proved , Jason would now have to march that Alice was negligent , and that much(prenominal) negligence is the proximate cause of his injury . To do this , he has to show that Alice fell short of the streamer of care required , that is , she failed to do what ! a reasonable , discreet person would do under the same or akin(predicate) circumstances (Prosser 1982 .

Jason may contest that in determining negligence , the law makes no notation as to whether or not the defendant is a learner driver or an undergo professional , that what is expected of Alice is that standard of care expected of a reasonable man in to prevent a predictable wrong . A reasonably diligent person ought to be aware that earthbound crossings are designated passageways for people and that it is a raw material rule among motorists to drill due care when approaching such crossings . As all learner driver ought to know , whiz of the fundamentals of serious driving is to be always rattling at pedestrian crossings traffic signs are adequate monition to this effect . so , a reasonably diligent driver should approach such crossing with caution by retardant down , his animal foot poised to hit the brake foot lever if necessary . Judicial notice may be taken of the fact that braking is one of the first skills taught a learner driverIn picturesque , Jason would have to satisfy the court (2 ) that the negligence of Alice is the proximate cause of Jason s injury , and (2 ) that there is no contributory negligence on his partProximate cause has been defined...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper